Also, Apoc can we get an update in the Hall of Fame on the first decade website? Edit: don't get seduced by my name. So I will do a week 3 and 4 update, got some heavy winners this week! And a word on patching, you only have to download the patch one time, not every time you log in, that would be a bit crazy. It's a simple quick update, nothing more, nothing less. It's definitely not indicative of a rushed game, this first patch is extremely small with only a few key fixes we wanted to ensure would get in after we went gold.
I second your opinion on heavy Day 1 patches, this is not the case here. If we rushed the game, it would have been out before Christmas So, Happy Merry 2nd Christmas to you all. This is a common practice that should be avoided and not become a 'regular' thing for PC gamers. Patching is not your friend. I believe you are wrong. Having regular patches is the best sign of support a company can give to it's community of players.
The extra download time is the drawback of that, but it is a minor drawback compared to the ability to listen and react to the community feedback, and of course fix technical issues that could arise.
The game industry is big and growing, but it is a tough market, and they need to sustain their growth, and like any other business in the world are driven by their profit margins. The best way to conciliate the two requirement good games and good profits is to make sure that launch deadlines are met and that there are realistic backup plans patches to address the issues that may have been missed because of the deadline.
If the company show that they show community support and reactivity to issues, and do not launch fire and forget games, we should support them. Regular patching, at least in the first year of a game release, is a must have for any company wishing to stay in business and grow their player base.
He has a point. A perfect game would need no patches. But life's not perfect, and many of the best RTSes have had many patches, often one after the other. Subway Surfers. TubeMate 3. Google Play. Biden to send military medical teams to help hospitals. N95, KN95, KF94 masks. GameStop PS5 in-store restock.
Baby Shark reaches 10 billion YouTube views. Microsoft is done with Xbox One. Windows Windows. Most Popular. New Releases. Desktop Enhancements. Networking Software. Trending from CNET. Download Now. Not everyone might be able to get the BFME disk there for I added a fix that you no longer need a disk or mini image to be able play the game.
Too stay up-to-date or in need of any help join the Facebook group: How to install patch 1. An older game that was under license of EA games called Medal of Honor allied assault and their expansions. Is still active today, modder community members made fixes for the game were one of which was a no cd crack.
Cause some used a no cd crack and others a disk to play online everyone was foced to use the no cd crack. So you didn't get sync error everytime with the server.
So it was widely know and EA never enforced anything related to the reverse engineering done or cracks being shared. I know it seem so logical for some of you to say its illegal and dismiss it but your missing the big picture.
But then by calling it patch 1. If I don't have either of your unofficial patches, will I be able to play with those that do have them? Before when you installed patch 1.
I follow the same logic to keep things simplified.
0コメント